Hi all,
I updates my previous patches [1] to add support for raid5/6.
These patches update the btrfs fi df command and add two new commands:
- btrfs filesystem disk-usage path
- btrfs device disk-usage path
The command btrfs filesystem df now shows only the disk usage/available.
$ sudo btrfs
On 11/02/2012 08:05 PM, Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:02:32 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
[...]
We could use Chunk(s) capacity instead of total/size ? I would like an
opinion from a english people point of view..
This is easy to
On 11/03/2012 12:44 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
1 MiB stored in RAID-5 across 3 devices takes up 1.5 MiB -- multiplier ×1.5
(1 MiB over 2 devices is 512 KiB, plus an additional 512 KiB for parity)
1 MiB stored in RAID-5 across 6 devices takes up 1.2 MiB -- multipler ×1.2
(1 MiB over 5 devices
On 11/02/2012 11:06 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
non-integer with the RAID-5/6 code (which is due Real Soon Now).
Hi Hugo,
do you have more information about raid ? When it will land on the btrfs
earth ? :-)
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it
Key fingerprint BBF5
do you have more information about raid ? When it will land on the btrfs
earth ? :-)
An unnamed source recently said today I'm fixing parity rebuild in
the middle of a read/modify/write. its one of my last blockers, at
which point several gags about progress meters were made.
--
To unsubscribe
Hi all, on the basis of the discussion in the thread
'[RFC] New attempt to a better btrfs fi df', I prepared the following
set of patches.
These patches update the btrfs fi df command and add two new commands:
- btrfs filesystem disk-usage path
- btrfs device disk-usage path
The command btrfs
Am Freitag, 2. November 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
Hi all, on the basis of the discussion in the thread
'[RFC] New attempt to a better btrfs fi df', I prepared the following
set of patches.
These patches update the btrfs fi df command and add two new commands:
- btrfs filesystem
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
I can test on some other boxes next week, if you want to.
Yes please,
I just wonder about one thing:
merkaba:[…]/btrfs-progs-unstable ./btrfs fi df /
Disk size:18.62GB
Disk allocated: 18.62GB
Disk unallocated:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:02:32 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Metadata, DUP is displayed as 3,50GB on the device level and as 1,75GB
in total. I understand the logic behind this, but this could be a bit
confusing.
But it makes sense: Showing
On 11/02/2012 08:05 PM, Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:02:32 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Metadata, DUP is displayed as 3,50GB on the device level and as 1,75GB
in total. I understand the logic behind this, but this could be a bit
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:31:56 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 11/02/2012 08:05 PM, Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:02:32 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Metadata, DUP is displayed as 3,50GB on the device level and as
1,75GB in total.
On 2 Nov 2012 20:40 +, from g2p.c...@gmail.com (Gabriel):
Now that I've started bikeshedding, here is something that I would
find pretty much ideal:
DataMetadata System Unallocated
VolGroup/Btrfs
Reserved 1.31TB 8.00MB +
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:05:37PM +, Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:02:32 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Metadata, DUP is displayed as 3,50GB on the device level and as 1,75GB
in total. I understand the logic behind this, but
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:06:04 +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:05:37PM +, Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:02:32 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Metadata, DUP is displayed as 3,50GB on the device level and as 1,75GB
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:46:35 +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 2 Nov 2012 20:40 +, from g2p.c...@gmail.com (Gabriel):
Now that I've started bikeshedding, here is something that I would
find pretty much ideal:
DataMetadata System Unallocated
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:23:14PM +, Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:06:04 +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:05:37PM +, Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:02:32 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2012-11-02 12:18, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo
