On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 09:53:15PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:53:33PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
This adds checks for the stated modes as if they are crap we will return
error
not
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 08:09:10PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:53:33PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
This adds checks for the stated modes as if they are crap we will return
error
not supported.
You've just enabled two options, but you haven't actually
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 08:09:10PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:53:33PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
This adds checks for the stated modes as if they are crap we will return
error
not supported.
This adds checks for the stated modes as if they are crap we will return error
not supported.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause xerofo...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/file.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 1f2b99c..599495a
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:53:33PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
This adds checks for the stated modes as if they are crap we will return error
not supported.
You've just enabled two options, but you haven't actually
implemented the code behind it. I would tell you *NOT* to do anything
else
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:53:33PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
This adds checks for the stated modes as if they are crap we will return
error
not supported.
You've just enabled two options, but you haven't actually
