Hi Filipe,
# I added Chris to the CC list since this topic is to discuss
# whether the current behavior is correct or not.
(2014/09/11 18:48), Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Satoru Takeuchi
takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Filipe,
(2014/09/11 0:10),
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Satoru Takeuchi
takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Filipe,
(2014/09/11 0:10), Filipe Manana wrote:
The behaviour of a 'chattr -c' consists of getting the current flags,
clearing the FS_COMPR_FL bit and then sending the result to the set
flags ioctl -
The behaviour of a 'chattr -c' consists of getting the current flags,
clearing the FS_COMPR_FL bit and then sending the result to the set
flags ioctl - this means the bit FS_NOCOMP_FL isn't set in the flags
passed to the ioctl. This results in the compression property not being
cleared from the
Hi Filipe,
(2014/09/11 0:10), Filipe Manana wrote:
The behaviour of a 'chattr -c' consists of getting the current flags,
clearing the FS_COMPR_FL bit and then sending the result to the set
flags ioctl - this means the bit FS_NOCOMP_FL isn't set in the flags
passed to the ioctl. This results
