On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:24:34 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
The 'git blame' history shows that, the old transaction commit code has to do
twice to ensure roots are updated and we have to flush metadata and super
block
manually, however, right now all of these can be handled well inside
the transaction
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:49:59AM +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:24:34 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
The 'git blame' history shows that, the old transaction commit code has to
do
twice to ensure roots are updated and we have to flush metadata and super
block
manually,
