2011/7/18 Josef Bacik :
> On 07/18/2011 02:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Currently we reserve enough space to COW an entirely full btree for every
>> extent
>> we have reserved for an inode. This _sucks_, because you only need to COW
>> once,
>> and then everybody else is ok. Unfortunately we do
On 07/18/2011 02:11 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Currently we reserve enough space to COW an entirely full btree for every
> extent
> we have reserved for an inode. This _sucks_, because you only need to COW
> once,
> and then everybody else is ok. Unfortunately we don't know we'll all be able
> t
Currently we reserve enough space to COW an entirely full btree for every extent
we have reserved for an inode. This _sucks_, because you only need to COW once,
and then everybody else is ok. Unfortunately we don't know we'll all be able to
get into the same transaction so that's what we have had
On 07/17/2011 11:04 PM, liubo wrote:
> On 07/16/2011 02:29 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Currently we reserve enough space to COW an entirely full btree for every
>> extent
>> we have reserved for an inode. This _sucks_, because you only need to COW
>> once,
>> and then everybody else is ok. Unfort
On 07/16/2011 02:29 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Currently we reserve enough space to COW an entirely full btree for every
> extent
> we have reserved for an inode. This _sucks_, because you only need to COW
> once,
> and then everybody else is ok. Unfortunately we don't know we'll all be able
> t
Currently we reserve enough space to COW an entirely full btree for every extent
we have reserved for an inode. This _sucks_, because you only need to COW once,
and then everybody else is ok. Unfortunately we don't know we'll all be able to
get into the same transaction so that's what we have had
