Josef
On mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:49:52 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:31:15AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:41:00 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered operations mutex when we
waited on ordered extents. We need this
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:31:29PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Josef
On mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:49:52 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:31:15AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:41:00 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered
On wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:41:00 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered operations mutex when we
waited on ordered extents. We need this because we splice the list and
process
it, so if a flusher came in during this scenario it would think the list was
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered operations mutex when we
waited on ordered extents. We need this because we splice the list and process
it, so if a flusher came in during this scenario it would think the list was
empty and we'd usually get an early ENOSPC. The problem with
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered operations mutex when we
waited on ordered extents. We need this because we splice the list and process
it, so if a flusher came in during this scenario it would think the list was
empty and we'd usually get an early ENOSPC. The problem with
