On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:11:42AM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
> >
> > On sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:55:53 +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> > > Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
> > > wait for delayed wo
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
>
> On sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:55:53 +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> > Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
> > wait for delayed work to finish before returning success to the
> > caller. This change fixes this
On sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:55:53 +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
> wait for delayed work to finish before returning success to the
> caller. This change fixes this, ensuring that there's no data loss
> if a power failure ha
Currently the fs sync function (super.c:btrfs_sync_fs()) doesn't
wait for delayed work to finish before returning success to the
caller. This change fixes this, ensuring that there's no data loss
if a power failure happens right after fs sync returns success to
the caller and before the next commit
