On 12/11/2014 03:05 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 12/10/2014 04:02 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Robert White posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:53:40 -0800 as excerpted:
[...]
And in the example, the mkfs was supplied with two
On 12/11/2014 11:53 AM, Duncan wrote:
Dongsheng Yang posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:02:15 +0800 as excerpted:
And in the example, the mkfs was supplied with two devices, so there's
no dup metadata remaining from a formerly single-device filesystem,
either. (Tho there will be the small
On 12/11/2014 02:25 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 12/10/2014 11:53 AM, Robert White wrote:
On 12/09/2014 05:08 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate
On 12/09/2014 05:08 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng
On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it is
calculating
the total size of disks and then dividing it by a factor.
Robert White posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:53:40 -0800 as excerpted:
On 12/09/2014 05:08 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it is
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Dongsheng Yang
yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
# df -h /mnt
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vdf1 3.0G 1018M 1.3G 45% /mnt
LOL -- not being a user of RAID I can't comment on the patch, but I
was somewhat wondering what the
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Robert White rwh...@pobox.com wrote:
On 12/09/2014 05:08 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng
On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Dongsheng Yang
yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
# df -h /mnt
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vdf1 3.0G 1018M 1.3G 45% /mnt
LOL -- not being a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Robert White posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:53:40 -0800 as excerpted:
On 12/09/2014 05:08 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 11:53 AM, Robert White wrote:
On 12/09/2014 05:08 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it
is calculating the total size
On 12/10/2014 04:02 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Robert White posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:53:40 -0800 as excerpted:
[...]
And in the example, the mkfs was supplied with two devices, so there's no
dup metadata remaining from a
On 12/10/2014 05:21 AM, Duncan wrote:
Robert White posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:53:40 -0800 as excerpted:
On 12/09/2014 05:08 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs()
On 12/10/2014 09:36 PM, Robert White wrote:
[...]
I tested it and sure enough, it's RAID1...
I also noticed that the default for data goes from single to RAID0 in
a two slice build.
I generally don't expect defaults to change in undocumented ways.
Particularly since that makes
Dongsheng Yang posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:02:15 +0800 as excerpted:
And in the example, the mkfs was supplied with two devices, so there's
no dup metadata remaining from a formerly single-device filesystem,
either. (Tho there will be the small single-mode stubs, empty,
remaining from the
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it is calculating
the total size of disks and then dividing it by a factor. But in some usecase,
the result is not good to user.
Example:
# mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdf1 /dev/vdf2 -d raid1
# mount /dev/vdf1 /mnt
# dd
Hi Dongsheng
On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it is calculating
the total size of disks and then dividing it by a factor. But in some usecase,
the result is not good to user.
Example:
# mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdf1
On 12/10/2014 02:47 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Dongsheng
On 12/09/2014 12:20 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
When function btrfs_statfs() calculate the tatol size of fs, it is calculating
the total size of disks and then dividing it by a factor. But in some usecase,
the result is not good to
17 matches
Mail list logo
