On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:48 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:52:56AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:46:00PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:47:09AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> > > The btrfs_release_path() is just useless as path is
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:52:56AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:46:00PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:47:09AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > > The btrfs_release_path() is just useless as path is only used in error
> > > handling.
> >
> > Where is it
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:46:00PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:47:09AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > The btrfs_release_path() is just useless as path is only used in error
> > handling.
>
> Where is it duplicated? And I don't think it's useless, while the
> changelog does
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:47:09AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> The btrfs_release_path() is just useless as path is only used in error
> handling.
Where is it duplicated? And I don't think it's useless, while the
changelog does not explain why and it's not obvious from the context. If
the path is
The btrfs_release_path() is just useless as path is only used in error handling.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index eba61bcb9bb3..5680e9c462a3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++
