On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 6.09.2018 09:47, Liu Bo wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
>>> Somehow this ends up with crash in btrfs/124, I'm trying to figure out
>>> what went wrong.
>>>
>>
>> It revealed the problem addressed in
On 6.09.2018 09:47, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
>> Somehow this ends up with crash in btrfs/124, I'm trying to figure out
>> what went wrong.
>>
>
> It revealed the problem addressed in Josef's patch[1], so with it,
> this patch works just fine.
What
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> Somehow this ends up with crash in btrfs/124, I'm trying to figure out
> what went wrong.
>
It revealed the problem addressed in Josef's patch[1], so with it,
this patch works just fine.
[1] btrfs: make sure we create all new bgs
thanks,
liubo
Somehow this ends up with crash in btrfs/124, I'm trying to figure out
what went wrong.
thanks,
liubo
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> __btrfs_end_transaction() has done the metadata release twice,
> probably because it used to process delayed refs in between, but now
> that we
On 5.09.2018 04:14, Liu Bo wrote:
> __btrfs_end_transaction() has done the metadata release twice,
> probably because it used to process delayed refs in between, but now
> that we don't process delayed refs any more, the 2nd release is always
> a noop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
Reviewed-by:
__btrfs_end_transaction() has done the metadata release twice,
probably because it used to process delayed refs in between, but now
that we don't process delayed refs any more, the 2nd release is always
a noop.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
---
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 6
