[PATCH] Xfstests/254: add more cases for testing btrfs snapshot in 254

2012-07-19 Thread Liu Bo
From: Zhou Bo This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot. Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo --- 254 | 321 ++- 1 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/254 b/254 index 7b74a02..9c320d0 100755 --- a/

[PATCH] Xfstests/254: add more cases for testing btrfs snapshot in 254

2012-07-19 Thread Liu Bo
From: Zhou Bo This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot. Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo --- 254 | 321 ++- 1 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/254 b/254 index 7b74a02..9c320d0 100755 --- a/

Re: [PATCH] Xfstests/254: add more cases for testing btrfs snapshot in 254

2012-07-19 Thread Liu Bo
Please ignore this...I forgot to CC xfs, sorry. thanks, liubo On 07/19/2012 05:24 PM, Liu Bo wrote: > From: Zhou Bo > > This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot. > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo > --- > 254 | 321 >

Re: [PATCH] Xfstests/254: add more cases for testing btrfs snapshot in 254

2012-07-19 Thread Dave Chinner
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:27:07PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > From: Zhou Bo > > This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot. > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo I think it is better to create a new test than modify the old one. That way it is easy to tell the difference between a new failu

Re: [PATCH] Xfstests/254: add more cases for testing btrfs snapshot in 254

2012-07-19 Thread Liu Bo
On 07/20/2012 08:24 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:27:07PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: >> From: Zhou Bo >> >> This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo > > I think it is better to create a new test than modify the old one. > That w