On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:20:06PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> On 23.04.2018 17:16, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:32:04PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >> Commit 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first
> >> key") introduced new @first_key parameter for
On 23.04.2018 17:16, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:32:04PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Commit 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first
>> key") introduced new @first_key parameter for read_tree_block(), however
>> caller in replace_path() is parasing wro
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:32:04PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Commit 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first
> key") introduced new @first_key parameter for read_tree_block(), however
> caller in replace_path() is parasing wrong key to read_tree_block().
>
> It should use
Commit 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first
key") introduced new @first_key parameter for read_tree_block(), however
caller in replace_path() is parasing wrong key to read_tree_block().
It should use parameter @first_key other than @key.
Normally it won't expose probl