To return EOPNOTSUPP is more user friendly than to return EINVAL,
and then user-space tool will show that the dev_replace operation
for raid56 is not currently supported rather than showing that
there is an invalid argument.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
index 9f22905..2af6e66 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int btrfs_dev_replace_start(struct btrfs_root *root,
 
        if (btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, RAID56)) {
                btrfs_warn(fs_info, "dev_replace cannot yet handle 
RAID5/RAID6");
-               return -EINVAL;
+               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
        }
 
        switch (args->start.cont_reading_from_srcdev_mode) {
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to