On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:01:31PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> 2017-10-12 21:38 GMT+09:00 David Sterba :
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:24AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> >> Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result,
> >> dependency files
2017-10-12 21:38 GMT+09:00 David Sterba :
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:24AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
>> Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result,
>> dependency files (*.o.d) also record the full path at the build time. Such
>> full path
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:24AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result,
> dependency files (*.o.d) also record the full path at the build time. Such
> full path dependency is annoying for sharing the source between multiple
>
Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result,
dependency files (*.o.d) also record the full path at the build time. Such
full path dependency is annoying for sharing the source between multiple
machines, containers, or anything the path differ.
And this is the same