On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:56:15PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> When checking the minimal nr_devs, there is one dead and meaningless
> condition:
>
> if (ndevs < devs_increment * sub_stripes || ndevs < devs_min) {
>
>
> This condition is meaningless,
On 2018年01月31日 15:35, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 31.01.2018 07:56, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> When checking the minimal nr_devs, there is one dead and meaningless
>> condition:
>>
>> if (ndevs < devs_increment * sub_stripes || ndevs < devs_min) {
>>
>>
>>
On 31.01.2018 07:56, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> When checking the minimal nr_devs, there is one dead and meaningless
> condition:
>
> if (ndevs < devs_increment * sub_stripes || ndevs < devs_min) {
>
>
> This condition is meaningless, @devs_increment has
When checking the minimal nr_devs, there is one dead and meaningless
condition:
if (ndevs < devs_increment * sub_stripes || ndevs < devs_min) {
This condition is meaningless, @devs_increment has nothing to do with
@sub_stripes.
In fact, in
