On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:34:49AM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> On 2017/08/25 2:37, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:53PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> >> "btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
> >> the implementation.
> >> Therefore change "f
On 2017/08/25 2:37, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:53PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
"btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
the implementation.
Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Is there a reason why a file should n
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:53PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> "btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
> the implementation.
> Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Is there a reason why a file should not be accepted? The ioctl supports
th
On 2017年08月24日 15:39, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
"btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
the implementation.
Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono
---
Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 2 +-
1
"btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
the implementation.
Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono
---
Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff