On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Noah Massey noah.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Dan Merillat dan.meril...@gmail.com wrote:
The inode is already found, use the data and make restore friendlier.
Signed-off-by: Dan Merillat dan.meril...@gmail.com
---
cmds-restore.c |
Dan Merillat posted on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:33:46 -0400 as excerpted:
The inode is already found, use the data and make restore friendlier.
Unless things have changed recently, restore doesn't even restore user/
group ownership, let alone permissions. IOW, atime/mtime are the least
of the
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:19:46 -0400
Dan Merillat dan.meril...@gmail.com wrote:
[Reordered to standard list quote/reply-in-context order.]
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Dan Merillat posted on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:33:46 -0400 as excerpted:
The inode is
The inode is already found, use the data and make restore friendlier.
Signed-off-by: Dan Merillat dan.meril...@gmail.com
---
cmds-restore.c | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmds-restore.c b/cmds-restore.c
index d2fc951..95ac487 100644
--- a/cmds-restore.c
+++
That's not a bad idea. In my case it was all owned by the same user
(media storage) so the only thing of interest was the timestamps.
I can whip up a patch to do that as well.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Dan Merillat posted on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:33:46
I think thunderbird ate that patch, sorry.
I didn't make it conditional - there's really no reason to not restore
the information. I was actually surprised that it didn't restore
before this patch.
If it looks good I'll resend without the word-wrapping.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
