On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:07:41AM +0800, Gui Hecheng wrote:
> +static int no_seed_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
Please reverse the meaning of the function, ie. something like
'has_seed_devices'. It's more natural to deal with negation operators
when they're explicit rather than hid
There is no need to try to build seed/sprout mapping for those btrfs
without seed devices, so just skip such fs.
We could get the total number of devices from the disk super block, if it
equals the number of items in list @fs_devices->devices, then there shouldn't
be any seed devices.
Signed-off-b
