This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
devices.
This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe
("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provis
On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote:
> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
> backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
> devices.
>
> This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe
> ("b
On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote:
This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
devices.
This test should pa
On 2018年04月11日 15:28, Su Yue wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote:
>>> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
>>> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
>>> backing size and big virtual size.
On 11.04.2018 10:29, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年04月11日 15:28, Su Yue wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote:
This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
It calls device mapper to create a thin provision devic
On 2018年04月11日 15:37, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 11.04.2018 10:29, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018年04月11日 15:28, Su Yue wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote:
> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:47:35PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> What about using lvm other than plain dmsetup to create thin provision
> devices?
> IIRC this should be much easier to implement, without all the linear
> target hassles.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, doing it by LVM is more conven
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:03:30PM +0800, Su Yue wrote:
> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
> backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
> devices.
>
> This test should pass after commit
On 04/11/2018 11:41 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:03:30PM +0800, Su Yue wrote:
This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
devices.