On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:13:18PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > BTRFS_IOC_LOGICAL_INO takes a btrfs_ioctl_logical_ino_args as argument,
> > not a btrfs_ioctl_ino_path_args. The lines were probably copy/pasted
> > when the code
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> BTRFS_IOC_LOGICAL_INO takes a btrfs_ioctl_logical_ino_args as argument,
> not a btrfs_ioctl_ino_path_args. The lines were probably copy/pasted
> when the code was written.
>
> Since btrfs_ioctl_logical_ino_args and btrfs_ioctl_
BTRFS_IOC_LOGICAL_INO takes a btrfs_ioctl_logical_ino_args as argument,
not a btrfs_ioctl_ino_path_args. The lines were probably copy/pasted
when the code was written.
Since btrfs_ioctl_logical_ino_args and btrfs_ioctl_ino_path_args have
the same size, the actual IOCTL definition here does not cha
