Re: [PATCH] fstests: Fix generic/102 fail for btrfs

2015-12-09 Thread Dave Chinner
; Cc: fste...@vger.kernel.org; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: Fix generic/102 fail for btrfs > > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:08:36PM +0800, Zhaolei wrote: > > > From: Zhao Lei <zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > > &g

RE: [PATCH] fstests: Fix generic/102 fail for btrfs

2015-12-07 Thread Zhao Lei
Hi, Dave Chinner > -Original Message- > From: Dave Chinner [mailto:da...@fromorbit.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:12 AM > To: Zhaolei <zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com> > Cc: fste...@vger.kernel.org; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstes

Re: [PATCH] fstests: Fix generic/102 fail for btrfs

2015-12-07 Thread Dave Chinner
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:08:36PM +0800, Zhaolei wrote: > From: Zhao Lei > > generic/102 sometimes fails in newest btrfs toolchain, > because it use non-mixed mode in default, which request more space > for metadata, and no space for data writing. > > This patch force

[PATCH] fstests: Fix generic/102 fail for btrfs

2015-12-03 Thread Zhaolei
From: Zhao Lei generic/102 sometimes fails in newest btrfs toolchain, because it use non-mixed mode in default, which request more space for metadata, and no space for data writing. This patch force mixed mode for btrfs in generic/102. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei