ux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: Fix generic/102 fail for btrfs
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:08:36PM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> > > From: Zhao Lei
> > >
> > > generic/102 sometimes fails in newest btrfs toolchain, because i
Hi, Dave Chinner
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Chinner [mailto:da...@fromorbit.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:12 AM
> To: Zhaolei
> Cc: fste...@vger.kernel.org; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: Fix generic/102 fail for btrfs
&
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:08:36PM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> From: Zhao Lei
>
> generic/102 sometimes fails in newest btrfs toolchain,
> because it use non-mixed mode in default, which request more space
> for metadata, and no space for data writing.
>
> This patch force mixed mode for btrfs in ge
From: Zhao Lei
generic/102 sometimes fails in newest btrfs toolchain,
because it use non-mixed mode in default, which request more space
for metadata, and no space for data writing.
This patch force mixed mode for btrfs in generic/102.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei
---
tests/generic/102 | 2 ++
1 f
