On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:49:12AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:40:26PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
This test
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:53:00AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:49:12AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:40:26PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
This test verifies that replacing a xattr's value is an atomic
operation. This is motivated by an issue in btrfs where replacing
a xattr's value wasn't an atomic operation, it consisted of
removing the old value and then inserting
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:40:26PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
This test verifies that replacing a xattr's value is an atomic
operation. This is motivated by an issue in btrfs where replacing
a xattr's value wasn't an
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:49:12AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:40:26PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
This test verifies that replacing a xattr's value is an atomic
operation. This is
This test verifies that replacing a xattr's value is an atomic
operation. This is motivated by an issue in btrfs where replacing
a xattr's value wasn't an atomic operation, it consisted of
removing the old value and then inserting the new value in a
btree. This made readers (getxattr and
