On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 09:28:58AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:05:16PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > Since the last time I sent this test, drop snapshot was broken again with
> > respect to qgroups. What practical step could I take to get a test for that
> > in here whic
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:05:16PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> Since the last time I sent this test, drop snapshot was broken again with
> respect to qgroups. What practical step could I take to get a test for that
> in here which I can beat the btrfs developers over the head with the next
> time s
Hey Dave, thanks for the review. A refreshed patch for you to look at is
attached.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:47:08PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:16:49PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > +status=1 # failure is the default!
> > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$sta
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:16:49PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + rm -fr $tmp
> +}
Missing a "cd /" (see the "new" template).
> +# Create an fs tree of a given height at
Test btrfs quota group consistency operations during snapshot
delete. Btrfs has had long standing issues with drop snapshot
failing to properly account for quota groups. This test crafts
several snapshot trees with shared and exclusive elements. One of
the trees is removed and then quota group cons
