[PATCH] xfstests: btrfs, test send's ability to punch holes and prealloc extents

2014-04-15 Thread Filipe David Borba Manana
This test verifies that after an incremental btrfs send the replicated file has the same exact hole and data structure as in the origin filesystem. This didn't use to be the case before the send stream version 2 - holes were sent as write operations of 0 valued bytes instead of punching holes with

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs, test send's ability to punch holes and prealloc extents

2014-04-15 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:43:21PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: > This test verifies that after an incremental btrfs send the replicated file > has > the same exact hole and data structure as in the origin filesystem. This > didn't > use to be the case before the send stream version 2

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs, test send's ability to punch holes and prealloc extents

2014-04-16 Thread Filipe David Manana
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:43:21PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: >> This test verifies that after an incremental btrfs send the replicated file >> has >> the same exact hole and data structure as in the origin filesystem. This >> d

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs, test send's ability to punch holes and prealloc extents

2014-04-16 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 03:39:18PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:43:21PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: > >> This test verifies that after an incremental btrfs send the replicated > >> file has > >>

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs, test send's ability to punch holes and prealloc extents

2014-04-16 Thread Filipe David Manana
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 03:39:18PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:43:21PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: >> >> This test verifies that after