Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix set-default test in btrfs/001

2013-10-16 Thread Rich Johnston
This has been committed. Thanks --Rich commit d4bc9576f09992dfc76eb34bb1aca3e80eaee1e7 Author: Josef Bacik Date: Wed Sep 18 20:48:27 2013 + xfstests: fix set-default test in btrfs/001 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix set-default test in btrfs/001

2013-10-16 Thread Rich Johnston
As it was tested by David Sterba Lokks good Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix set-default test in btrfs/001

2013-09-19 Thread David Sterba
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:48:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > We were actually testing this improperly, there was a bug in the set default > code so we weren't actually honoring the 0 subvolid properly. To fix this we > need to get the subvolid for the subvol we want to set as the default and use

[PATCH] xfstests: fix set-default test in btrfs/001

2013-09-18 Thread Josef Bacik
We were actually testing this improperly, there was a bug in the set default code so we weren't actually honoring the 0 subvolid properly. To fix this we need to get the subvolid for the subvol we want to set as the default and use that in the command. With this patch we now pass again with the f