On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:53 AM David Sterba wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> > > on changing the license of the
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:53 AM David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> > on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
> > to resolve various concern
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
> to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
> with libbtrfsutil.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
> to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
> with libbtrfsutil.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:32:30AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/3/18 上午4:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> > on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
> > to resolve various concerns around the
On 18/03/2021 04:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
with libbtrfsutil.
Each significant (i.e.
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 16:01 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign
> off
> on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in
> order
> to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
> with libbtrfsutil.
>
On 2021/3/18 上午4:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
with libbtrfsutil.
Each significant (i.e.
> Subject: [PATCH 0/1] btrfs-progs: libbtrfsutil: Relicense to LGPLv2.1+
>
> This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
> to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
> to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
> with libbtrfsutil.
This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
with libbtrfsutil.
Each significant (i.e. non-trivial) commit author has been CC'd to
11 matches
Mail list logo
