On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:46:56PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli
>> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 18 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
>> >> I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
>>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:46:56PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> btrfs defrag file
> btrfs defrag directory
> btrfs defrag subvol
> btrfs defrag pool
I think this could be implied by , so it will be better to drop
3rd word:
btrfs defrag /this/file
btrfs defrag /mnt/btrfs/somedir/
btrfs defrag
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:46:56PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> > wrote:
> > > On Thursday 18 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> > >> I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
> >
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:35:26PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > I think he need some command hierarchy here.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> > wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:46:56PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> >> I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
> >>
> >
> > I try to summarise your suggestions. But there ar
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli
wrote:
> On Thursday 18 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
>> I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
>>
>
> I try to summarise your suggestions. But there are some cases not to clear for
> me.
> I grouped the commands in three cate
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
>
I try to summarise your suggestions. But there are some cases not to clear for
me.
I grouped the commands in three categories: subvolume, devices, and
filesystem.
devices scan
de
I'm happy that I'm not alone with my preference for subcommands :) over short
- commands.
Btw: I think it would be a good idea start from the beginning with a 'libbtrfs'
library and a corresponding API. That way integrating into other languages like
Python and integration into tools like parted
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:35:26PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>> I think he need some command hierarchy here.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
>> wrote:
>> > OPT
I do like the subcommand method, more details below.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:35:26PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I think he need some command hierarchy here.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> wrote:
> > OPTIONS
> > snapshot|-s [/]
> > Create a writ
Hi,
I agree with Mike, it's just much much more pleasant and intuitive to
work with the hierarchyial cli he suggests.
Alex
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I think he need some command hierarchy here.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> wrote:
>
>> OPTIONS
>> snapshot|-s
I think he need some command hierarchy here.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
wrote:
> OPTIONS
> snapshot|-s [/]
> Create a writeble snapshot of the subvolume with the
> name in the directory. If is not a sub‐
> volume, b
On Wednesday 17 February 2010, you (Andreas Philipp) wrote:
>
> Andreas Philipp
Thank you, I corrected my source and updated the changes to the public
repository.
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo)
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
-
Hi,
Cool tool.
Just looking at the help output on the console I found a small typo.
Kind regards,
Andreas Philipp
diff --git a/btrfs.c b/btrfs.c
index cc55599..f3e5d8d 100644
--- a/btrfs.c
+++ b/btrfs.c
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static struct Command commands[] = {
"Add a device to a f
Hi all,
enclosed in the next two emails you can find two patches which introduce a new
program called "btrfs". This program has the ambitious to replace the
utilities of the btrfs-prog package, like:
- btrfsctl
- btrfs-show
- btrfs-volume
- btrfs
The goals are:
- improve the usability of the to
15 matches
Mail list logo
