At 04/26/2017 03:25 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hello Qu,
still noone on this one? Or is this one solved in another way in 4.10 or
4.11 or is compression just experimental? Haven't seen a note on this.
Still pushing the patchset in in-band dedupe patchset.
I'll re-push them in
Hello Qu,
still noone on this one? Or is this one solved in another way in 4.10 or
4.11 or is compression just experimental? Haven't seen a note on this.
Thanks,
Stefan
Am 27.02.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Hi,
>
> can please anybody comment on that one? Josef? Chris?
Hi,
can please anybody comment on that one? Josef? Chris? I still need those
patches to be able to let btrfs run for more than 24hours without ENOSPC
issues.
Greets,
Stefan
Am 27.02.2017 um 08:22 schrieb Qu Wenruo:
>
>
> At 02/25/2017 04:23 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Dear Qu,
At 02/25/2017 04:23 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Dear Qu,
any news on your branch? I still don't see it merged anywhere.
Greets,
Stefan
I just remember that Liu Bo has commented one of the patches, I'm afraid
I can only push these patches until I addressed his concern.
I'll
I sent mail to David asking about these unmerged patchset, but no reply yet.
And to my surprise, the patch even disappeared from david's for-next branch.
Not sure what's wrong with all these unmerged patches.
Thanks,
Qu
At 02/25/2017 04:23 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Dear Qu,
Dear Qu,
any news on your branch? I still don't see it merged anywhere.
Greets,
Stefan
Am 04.01.2017 um 17:13 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Hi Qu,
>
> Am 01.01.2017 um 10:32 schrieb Qu Wenruo:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> I'm trying to push it to for-next (will be v4.11), but no response yet.
Hi Qu,
Am 01.01.2017 um 10:32 schrieb Qu Wenruo:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I'm trying to push it to for-next (will be v4.11), but no response yet.
>
> It would be quite nice for you to test the following git pull and give
> some feedback, so that we can merge it faster.
>
>
Hi Stefan,
I'm trying to push it to for-next (will be v4.11), but no response yet.
It would be quite nice for you to test the following git pull and give
some feedback, so that we can merge it faster.
https://mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg60418.html
Thanks,
Qu
On
Any news on this series? I can't see it in 4.9 nor in 4.10-rc
Stefan
Am 11.11.2016 um 09:39 schrieb Wang Xiaoguang:
> When having compression enabled, Stefan Priebe ofen got enospc errors
> though fs still has much free space. Qu Wenruo also has submitted a
> fstests test case which can
hello,
Any comments about this patchset?
The first two patches almost don't do any functional change which I think
could be review firstly.
btrfs: improve inode's outstanding_extents computation
btrfs: introduce type based delalloc metadata reserve
Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang
On
When having compression enabled, Stefan Priebe ofen got enospc errors
though fs still has much free space. Qu Wenruo also has submitted a
fstests test case which can reproduce this bug steadily, please see
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9420527
First patch[1/3] "btrfs: improve inode's
11 matches
Mail list logo
