Mark Fasheh wrote on 2015/09/22 13:15 -0700:
Hi,
The following 4 patches fix a regression introduced in Linux
4.2 where btrfs_drop_snapshot() wasn't updating qgroups, resulting in
them going bad.
The original e-mail pointing this out is below:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg4609
Mark Fasheh wrote on 2015/09/23 14:49 -0700:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:40:42AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Thanks for all your work on this.
Comment on test case is inlined below.
No problem, thanks for the review Qu!
+# Create an fs tree of a given height at a target location. This is
+# do
Mark Fasheh posted on Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:49:26 -0700 as excerpted:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:40:42AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>> I'd prefer a more accurate calculation based on nodesize.
>> That would allow using any possible nodesize.
>
> How do we query nodesize? 'btrfs fi show' doesn't
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:58:57AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I'd like to test the patchset, but it seems to be a little out of
> date, and failed to apply to integration-4.3.
>
> Would you please rebase it to integration-4.3?
Hey Qu I think you just need to drop the patch titled:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:40:42AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Thanks for all your work on this.
> Comment on test case is inlined below.
No problem, thanks for the review Qu!
> >+# Create an fs tree of a given height at a target location. This is
> >+# done by agressively creating inline extents
On 09/23/15 05:58, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> I'd like to test the patchset, but it seems to be a little out of
> date, and failed to apply to integration-4.3.
The first two patches were already merged yesterday, so if you just
skip those you should get further.
-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hi Mark,
I'd like to test the patchset, but it seems to be a little out of date,
and failed to apply to integration-4.3.
Would you please rebase it to integration-4.3?
Thanks,
Qu
Mark Fasheh wrote on 2015/09/22 13:15 -0700:
Hi,
The following 4 patches fix a regression introduced in Linux
4
Hi Mark,
Thanks for all your work on this.
Comment on test case is inlined below.
Mark Fasheh wrote on 2015/09/22 14:12 -0700:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 01:15:44PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
The entire patch series can be tested with the following xfstests.git
patch, which will be sent to the app
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 01:15:44PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> The entire patch series can be tested with the following xfstests.git
> patch, which will be sent to the appropriate list shortly)
>
> https://github.com/markfasheh/xfstests/commit/b09ca51c012824e44546b13862ab1f93a6f2f675
That xfstest
Hi,
The following 4 patches fix a regression introduced in Linux
4.2 where btrfs_drop_snapshot() wasn't updating qgroups, resulting in
them going bad.
The original e-mail pointing this out is below:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46093.html
The first two patches are from Josef and
10 matches
Mail list logo
