On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:17:55 -0700
Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org writes:
Am I too paranoid about the issue?
It sounds weird, because if the kernel would really checksum
mutexes on disk you would have a lot of on disk
format incompatibility
Some clarifications:
Patchset based on 'tmp' branch e6bd18d8938986c997c45f0ea95b221d4edec095.
All patches are against btrfs-progs.
The rest of rambling is about kernel code, which handles supers.
I have read what I've wrote last night (braindump of insane!)
and will try to elaborate a
Hello friends!
tmp branch recently got very nice feature: 'mkfs.btrfs -r /some/directory'.
It's very useful, when you need to creare minimal root: sh and fs_mark.
But there is another hidden feature! As '-r' can create whole filesystem
we can effectively valgrind a lot of code paths in btrfs
