Re: [PATCH 04/31] btrfs: tests, move initialization into tests/

2016-06-26 Thread Jeff Mahoney
On 6/26/16 10:17 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > At 06/25/2016 06:14 AM, je...@suse.com wrote: >> From: Jeff Mahoney >> >> We have all these stubs that only exist because they're called from >> btrfs_run_sanity_tests, which is a static inside super.c. Let's just >> move it all into

Re: [PATCH 04/31] btrfs: tests, move initialization into tests/

2016-06-26 Thread Qu Wenruo
At 06/25/2016 06:14 AM, je...@suse.com wrote: From: Jeff Mahoney We have all these stubs that only exist because they're called from btrfs_run_sanity_tests, which is a static inside super.c. Let's just move it all into tests/btrfs-tests.c and only have one stub.

[PATCH 04/31] btrfs: tests, move initialization into tests/

2016-06-24 Thread jeffm
From: Jeff Mahoney We have all these stubs that only exist because they're called from btrfs_run_sanity_tests, which is a static inside super.c. Let's just move it all into tests/btrfs-tests.c and only have one stub. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney ---