Signed-off-by: David Sterba
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 31f33ba..c97ceab 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -756,8 +756,6 @@ again:
(2011/04/22 18:41), David Sterba wrote:
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |6 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 31f33ba..c97ceab 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>
Excerpts from Tsutomu Itoh's message of 2011-04-25 02:25:58 -0400:
> (2011/04/22 18:41), David Sterba wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |6 --
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btr
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:12:59AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > This code tests whether the mutex_lock can be acquired, and when the
> > mutex_lock can be taken, it try again.
> > So I think that it is not a meaningless code.
>
> Correct, this code is waiting for the current lock holder to finish