On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:56:04AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image +
> corrupt script fsck test case.
> From: Dave Chinner
> To: Filipe David Manana
> Date: 2014年12月24日 08:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image +
corrupt script fsck test case.
From: Dave Chinner
To: Filipe David Manana
Date: 2014年12月24日 08:03
[ Sorry to take some time to get to this, it got caught by a spam
filter and I only just
bject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image + corrupt
> > script fsck test case.
> > From: David Sterba
> > To: Filipe David Manana
> > Date: 2014年12月16日 02:19
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:13:45AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 02:09:02PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> It seems the second patch, which about 225K including a btrfs-image
> dump, can't pass the ml's size limit.
I've cherry-picked the commit with the test image.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image +
corrupt script fsck test case.
From: Filipe David Manana
To: Qu Wenruo
Date: 2014年12月16日 21:55
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image + corrupt
> script fsck test case.
> From: David Sterba
> To: Filipe David Manana
> Date: 2014年12月16日 02:19
>>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image + corrupt
> script fsck test case.
> From: David Sterba
> To: Filipe David Manana
> Date: 2014年12月16日 01:35
>>
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image +
corrupt script fsck test case.
From: David Sterba
To: Filipe David Manana
Date: 2014年12月16日 02:19
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:13:45AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
So another thing I
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image +
corrupt script fsck test case.
From: Filipe David Manana
To: Qu Wenruo
Date: 2014年12月15日 17:43
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image +
corrupt script fsck test case.
From: David Sterba
To: Filipe David Manana
Date: 2014年12月16日 01:35
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:36:51AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
So another thing I
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:13:45AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> >
> > So another thing I would like to see is doing a more comprehensive
> > verification that the repair code worked as expected. Currently we
> > only check that a readonly fsck, after running fsck --repair, returns
> > 0.
> >
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:36:51AM +, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> So another thing I would like to see is doing a more comprehensive
> verification that the repair code worked as expected. Currently we
> only check that a readonly fsck, after running fsck --repair, returns
> 0.
>
> For the im
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Although btrfsck test case support pure image dump(tar.xz), it is still
>> too large for some images, e.g, a small 64M image with about 3 levels
>> (level 0~2) metadata will produce
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image + corrupt
> script fsck test case.
> From: Filipe David Manana
> To: Qu Wenruo
> Date: 2014年12月15日 17:00
>>
&
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: Add support for btrfs-image +
corrupt script fsck test case.
From: Filipe David Manana
To: Qu Wenruo
Date: 2014年12月15日 17:00
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Although btrfsck test case support pure
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Although btrfsck test case support pure image dump(tar.xz), it is still
> too large for some images, e.g, a small 64M image with about 3 levels
> (level 0~2) metadata will produce about 2.6M after xz zip, which is too
> large for a single binary
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Although btrfsck test case support pure image dump(tar.xz), it is still
> too large for some images, e.g, a small 64M image with about 3 levels
> (level 0~2) metadata will produce about 2.6M after xz zip, which is too
> large for a single binary
progs: Add support for btrfs-image + corrupt
script fsck test case.
From: Qu Wenruo
To:
Date: 2014年12月15日 11:54
Although btrfsck test case support pure image dump(tar.xz), it is still
too large for some images, e.g, a small 64M image with about 3 levels
(level 0~2) metadata will produce about 2.6
Although btrfsck test case support pure image dump(tar.xz), it is still
too large for some images, e.g, a small 64M image with about 3 levels
(level 0~2) metadata will produce about 2.6M after xz zip, which is too
large for a single binary commit.
However btrfs-image -c9 will works much finer, the
19 matches
Mail list logo
