Both tests look good and work fine for me,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()'ing directories and fsync()'ing after
renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing.
This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common helper to be shared between
generic/311 and generic/321. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
---
V1
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:12:16AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:01:03PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Btrfs had some issues with fsync()'ing directories and fsync()'ing after
> > renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing.
> > This br
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:01:03PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Btrfs had some issues with fsync()'ing directories and fsync()'ing after
> renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing.
> This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common helper to be shared between
> gen
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()'ing directories and fsync()'ing after
renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing.
This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common helper to be shared between
generic/311 and generic/321. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
---
V1
