On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:54:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:05:04AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> > Where the hell would truncate(2) get struct file, anyway? IOW, the inode
> > argument is _not_ pointless; re-added.
>
> Oh, right. Interestingly is seems like xfstest
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:05:04AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> Where the hell would truncate(2) get struct file, anyway? IOW, the inode
> argument is _not_ pointless; re-added.
Oh, right. Interestingly is seems like xfstests has no coverage of this
code path at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Pass a loff_t end for the last byte instead of the 32-bit count
> parameter to allow full file clones even on 32-bit architectures.
> While we're at it also drop the pointless inode argument and simplify
> the read/write selection
Pass a loff_t end for the last byte instead of the 32-bit count
parameter to allow full file clones even on 32-bit architectures.
While we're at it also drop the pointless inode argument and simplify
the read/write selection.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields
---
fs/loc
