On 2019/3/20 上午8:46, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/3/19 下午10:50, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> We already have btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to verify each chunk before
>>> tree-checker.
>>>
>>> Merge that function into tree-checker, and upda
On 2019/3/19 下午10:50, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> We already have btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to verify each chunk before
>> tree-checker.
>>
>> Merge that function into tree-checker, and update its error message to
>> be more readable.
>>
>>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> We already have btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to verify each chunk before
> tree-checker.
>
> Merge that function into tree-checker, and update its error message to
> be more readable.
>
> Old error message would be something like:
> BTRF
On 13.03.19 г. 10:55 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> We already have btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to verify each chunk before
> tree-checker.
>
> Merge that function into tree-checker, and update its error message to
> be more readable.
>
> Old error message would be something like:
> BTRFS error (devic
We already have btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to verify each chunk before
tree-checker.
Merge that function into tree-checker, and update its error message to
be more readable.
Old error message would be something like:
BTRFS error (device dm-3): invalid chunk num_stipres: 0
New error message woul
