Reviewed-by: Anand Jain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
#define __GFP_RECLAIM ((__force
gfp_t)(___GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM|___GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM))
#define GFP_NOFS(__GFP_RECLAIM | __GFP_IO)
Ah. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordo
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 06:21:17PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 06/03/17 00:58, David Sterba wrote:
> > Christoph pointed out that bio allocations backed by a bioset will never
> > fail.
>
> Looks like this feature comes when __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is
> set and we aren't, such as [1]. Any idea
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 06:21:17PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 06/03/17 00:58, David Sterba wrote:
>> Christoph pointed out that bio allocations backed by a bioset will never
>> fail.
>
> David,
>
> Looks like this feature comes when __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is
> set and we aren't, such as [1]
On 06/03/17 00:58, David Sterba wrote:
Christoph pointed out that bio allocations backed by a bioset will never
fail.
David,
Looks like this feature comes when __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is
set and we aren't, such as [1]. Any idea why? Looks like I am
missing something ?
[1]
-
static int
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:58:30PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> Christoph pointed out that bio allocations backed by a bioset will never
> fail. As we always use a bioset for all bio allocations, we can skip
> the error handling. This patch adjusts our low-level helpers, the
> cascaded changes to
Christoph pointed out that bio allocations backed by a bioset will never
fail. As we always use a bioset for all bio allocations, we can skip
the error handling. This patch adjusts our low-level helpers, the
cascaded changes to all callers will come next.
CC: Christoph Hellwig
CC: Liu Bo
Signe
