On 29.09.2017 22:43, Josef Bacik wrote:
> This is just excessive information in the ref_head, and makes the code
> complicated. It is a relic from when we had the heads and the refs in
> the same tree, which is no longer the case. With this removal I've
> cleaned up a bunch of the cruft around
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:43:57PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> This is just excessive information in the ref_head, and makes the code
> complicated. It is a relic from when we had the heads and the refs in
> the same tree, which is no longer the case. With this removal I've
> cleaned up a bunch
This is just excessive information in the ref_head, and makes the code
complicated. It is a relic from when we had the heads and the refs in
the same tree, which is no longer the case. With this removal I've
cleaned up a bunch of the cruft around this old assumption as well.
Signed-off-by:
