Re: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: check-int: don't complain about balanced blocks

2014-10-17 Thread Wang Shilong
The xfstest btrfs/014 which tests the balance operation caused that the check_int module complained that known blocks changed their physical location. Since this is not an error in this case, only print such message if the verbose mode was enabled. Reported-by: Wang Shilong

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: check-int: don't complain about balanced blocks

2014-10-17 Thread Miao Xie
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:48:49 +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: The xfstest btrfs/014 which tests the balance operation caused that the check_int module complained that known blocks changed their physical location. Since this is not an error in this case, only print such message if the verbose mode

[PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: check-int: don't complain about balanced blocks

2014-10-16 Thread Stefan Behrens
The xfstest btrfs/014 which tests the balance operation caused that the check_int module complained that known blocks changed their physical location. Since this is not an error in this case, only print such message if the verbose mode was enabled. Reported-by: Wang Shilong