On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 06:22:02PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
On 08/28/2012 01:12 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:52:20AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
This is based on Josef's Btrfs: turbo charge fsync.
The above Josef's patch performs very good in random sync write test,
because we
This is based on Josef's Btrfs: turbo charge fsync.
The above Josef's patch performs very good in random sync write test,
because we won't have too much extents to merge.
However, it does not performs good on the test:
dd if=/dev/zero of=foobar bs=4k count=12500 oflag=sync
The reason is when we
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:52:20AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
This is based on Josef's Btrfs: turbo charge fsync.
The above Josef's patch performs very good in random sync write test,
because we won't have too much extents to merge.
However, it does not performs good on the test:
dd
On 08/28/2012 01:12 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:52:20AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
This is based on Josef's Btrfs: turbo charge fsync.
The above Josef's patch performs very good in random sync write test,
because we won't have too much extents to merge.
However, it does not
