On 2019/3/20 上午2:23, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:04:18PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> This new tree block flag is to indicate the tree block belongs to a log
>> tree.
>>
>> For btrfs on-disk format, there are several different trees could use
>> the same owner number:
>> - ordi
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:04:18PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This new tree block flag is to indicate the tree block belongs to a log
> tree.
>
> For btrfs on-disk format, there are several different trees could use
> the same owner number:
> - ordinary subvolume tree
> - log tree for ordinary subv
On 2019/3/19 下午2:04, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This new tree block flag is to indicate the tree block belongs to a log
> tree.
>
> For btrfs on-disk format, there are several different trees could use
> the same owner number:
> - ordinary subvolume tree
> - log tree for ordinary subvolume
> - reloc tre
On 2019/3/19 下午3:04, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 19.03.19 г. 8:04 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> This new tree block flag is to indicate the tree block belongs to a log
>> tree.
>>
>> For btrfs on-disk format, there are several different trees could use
>> the same owner number:
>> - ordinary sub
On 19.03.19 г. 8:04 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This new tree block flag is to indicate the tree block belongs to a log
> tree.
>
> For btrfs on-disk format, there are several different trees could use
> the same owner number:
> - ordinary subvolume tree
> - log tree for ordinary subvolume
> - reloc
This new tree block flag is to indicate the tree block belongs to a log
tree.
For btrfs on-disk format, there are several different trees could use
the same owner number:
- ordinary subvolume tree
- log tree for ordinary subvolume
- reloc tree for ordinary subvolume
It's possible to do the backre
