This patch completes the 2-patches patch series which modifies
btrfs_start_transaction() to receive an u64 as its "num_items"
parameter thus avoiding to pass an int to start_transaction()
which actually takes an u64.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexande...@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index b823fac..92f6060 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -2266,7 +2266,7 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t 
offset, loff_t len)
        u64 drop_end;
        int ret = 0;
        int err = 0;
-       int rsv_count;
+       u64 rsv_count;
        bool same_page;
        bool no_holes = btrfs_fs_incompat(root->fs_info, NO_HOLES);
        u64 ino_size;
-- 
2.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to