; Subject: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: get fs_devices pointer form btrfs_scan_one_device
>
> Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
> btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang
> ---
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 29 ++
Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 29 ++---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 +++---
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 27
On 10.07.2018 09:33, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
> btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang
> ---
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 29 ++---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 +++---
>
Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 29 ++---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 +++---
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 27
