On 11/30/2018 09:05 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
On 11/29/2018 10:31 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:47:27PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
2. scrub_workers_refcnt must eventually be converted to refcount_t type
ok. Added in v2 patch set.
No such thing is in v2 and this would
On 11/29/2018 10:31 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:47:27PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
2. scrub_workers_refcnt must eventually be converted to refcount_t type
ok. Added in v2 patch set.
No such thing is in v2 and this would actually get rid of the need to
hold scrub_lo
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:47:27PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> > 2. scrub_workers_refcnt must eventually be converted to refcount_t type
>
> ok. Added in v2 patch set.
No such thing is in v2 and this would actually get rid of the need to
hold scrub_lock in scrub_workers_put. Which in turn can be
On 11/26/2018 05:59 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 26.11.18 г. 11:07 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
Circular locking dependency check reports warning[1], that's because
the btrfs_scrub_dev() calls the stack #0 below with, the
fs_info::scrub_lock held. The test case leading to this warning..
mkfs.
On 26.11.18 г. 11:07 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
> Circular locking dependency check reports warning[1], that's because
> the btrfs_scrub_dev() calls the stack #0 below with, the
> fs_info::scrub_lock held. The test case leading to this warning..
>
> mkfs.btrfs -fq /dev/sdb && mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
Circular locking dependency check reports warning[1], that's because
the btrfs_scrub_dev() calls the stack #0 below with, the
fs_info::scrub_lock held. The test case leading to this warning..
mkfs.btrfs -fq /dev/sdb && mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
btrfs scrub start -B /btrfs
In fact we have fs_info:
