Hello, Josef.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 05:16:03PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > It bothers me a bit that sb's can actually be off bdi->sb_list while
> > sb_list_lock is released. Can we make this explicit? e.g. keep
> > separate bdi sb list for sb's pending metadata writeout (like b_dirty)
> > or
On Tue 09-08-16 15:08:27, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Provide a mechanism for file systems to indicate how much dirty metadata they
> are holding. This introduces a few things
>
> 1) Zone stats for dirty metadata, which is the same as the NR_FILE_DIRTY.
> 2) WB stat for dirty metadata. This way we know
On 08/10/2016 04:12 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Josef.
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:08:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Provide a mechanism for file systems to indicate how much dirty metadata they
are holding. This introduces a few things
1) Zone stats for dirty metadata, which is the same as th
Hello, Josef.
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:08:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Provide a mechanism for file systems to indicate how much dirty metadata they
> are holding. This introduces a few things
>
> 1) Zone stats for dirty metadata, which is the same as the NR_FILE_DIRTY.
> 2) WB stat for di
On 08/10/2016 06:09 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 09-08-16 15:08:27, Josef Bacik wrote:
Provide a mechanism for file systems to indicate how much dirty metadata they
are holding. This introduces a few things
1) Zone stats for dirty metadata, which is the same as the NR_FILE_DIRTY.
2) WB stat for
Provide a mechanism for file systems to indicate how much dirty metadata they
are holding. This introduces a few things
1) Zone stats for dirty metadata, which is the same as the NR_FILE_DIRTY.
2) WB stat for dirty metadata. This way we know if we need to try and call into
the file system to wri
