On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:39:45AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On 06/29/2012 06:36 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:00:37PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
We have both set-default and get-default, but actually our get-default
does not show which one is the default one.
This patch
On 07/02/2012 05:45 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:39:45AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On 06/29/2012 06:36 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:00:37PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
We have both set-default and get-default, but actually our get-default
does not show which
On 06/29/2012 06:36 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:00:37PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
We have both set-default and get-default, but actually our get-default
does not show which one is the default one.
This patch plus the kernel side patch fix this.
Are you referring to the
We have both set-default and get-default, but actually our get-default
does not show which one is the default one.
This patch plus the kernel side patch fix this.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
Makefile |6 +++---
btrfs-list.c | 44
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:00:37PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
We have both set-default and get-default, but actually our get-default
does not show which one is the default one.
This patch plus the kernel side patch fix this.
Are you referring to the fact that get-default in Chris' btrfs-progs
