On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:02:51 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2015 01:31:43 +0900 (JST) Ryusuke Konishi
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 10:16:23 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> > The "fh_len" passed to ->fh_to_* is not guaranteed to be that same as
>> > that returned by encode_fh - it may b
On Fri, 08 May 2015 10:16:23 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> The "fh_len" passed to ->fh_to_* is not guaranteed to be that same as
> that returned by encode_fh - it may be larger.
>
> With NFSv2, the filehandle is fixed length, so it may appear longer
> than expected and be zero-padded.
>
> So we must
