On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:34:15AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 3.12.18 г. 19:25 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 09:29:27AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> >>> - ret = find_free_dev_extent(trans, device, min_free,
> >>> -
On 3.12.18 г. 19:25 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 09:29:27AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>> - ret = find_free_dev_extent(trans, device, min_free,
>>> - _offset, NULL);
>>> - if (!ret)
>>> +
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 09:29:27AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> > - ret = find_free_dev_extent(trans, device, min_free,
> > - _offset, NULL);
> > - if (!ret)
> > + if (!find_free_dev_extent(trans,
On 10/26/2018 07:43 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
btrfs_can_relocate returns 0 when it concludes the given chunk can be
relocated and -1 otherwise. Since this function is used as a predicated
and it return a binary value it makes no sense to have it's return
value as an int so change it to bool.
On 2018/10/26 下午7:43, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> btrfs_can_relocate returns 0 when it concludes the given chunk can be
> relocated and -1 otherwise. Since this function is used as a predicated
> and it return a binary value it makes no sense to have it's return
> value as an int so change it to
btrfs_can_relocate returns 0 when it concludes the given chunk can be
relocated and -1 otherwise. Since this function is used as a predicated
and it return a binary value it makes no sense to have it's return
value as an int so change it to bool. Furthermore, remove a stale
leftover comment from
