[PATCH 24/42] btrfs: assert on non-empty delayed iputs

2018-10-12 Thread Josef Bacik
I ran into an issue where there was some reference being held on an inode that I couldn't track. This assert wasn't triggered, but it at least rules out we're doing something stupid. Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 +

[PATCH 24/42] btrfs: assert on non-empty delayed iputs

2018-10-11 Thread Josef Bacik
I ran into an issue where there was some reference being held on an inode that I couldn't track. This assert wasn't triggered, but it at least rules out we're doing something stupid. Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 +

Re: [PATCH 24/42] btrfs: assert on non-empty delayed iputs

2018-10-08 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 07:18:03AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I ran into an issue where there was some reference being held on an > inode that I couldn't track. This assert wasn't triggered, but it at > least rules out we're doing something stupid. > > Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval >

[PATCH 24/42] btrfs: assert on non-empty delayed iputs

2018-09-28 Thread Josef Bacik
I ran into an issue where there was some reference being held on an inode that I couldn't track. This assert wasn't triggered, but it at least rules out we're doing something stupid. Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1