Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-19 Thread Rich Johnston
This has been reverted and recommitted as test 307. Thanks --Rich commit 4f092a2e681c57394a0055a0735b8208bf83ec5f Author: Eric Sandeen Date: Wed Mar 13 19:01:58 2013 + xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands Run basic btrfs information commands in various ways, p

Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-18 Thread Rich Johnston
Dave, Sorry for skipping test numbers, I was going to revert, correct the test number and resubmit this patch. Do you want me to rename btrfs.filter to common.filter.btrfs when I resubmit this patch? Regards --Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in

Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-15 Thread Eric Sandeen
On Mar 15, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Rich Johnston wrote: > On 03/15/2013 08:46 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Yep sorry. I figure its always a race in numbers do I don't bother with >> fixing them up. Should I? > > Eric, > I was going to revert and resubmit as test 306, is that OK with you? > Sure, of

Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-15 Thread Rich Johnston
On 03/15/2013 08:46 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: Yep sorry. I figure its always a race in numbers do I don't bother with fixing them up. Should I? Eric, I was going to revert and resubmit as test 306, is that OK with you? On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2013

Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-15 Thread Eric Sandeen
Yep sorry. I figure its always a race in numbers do I don't bother with fixing them up. Should I? On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:01:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Run basic btrfs information commands in various ways, performing >> sanity test

Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-15 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:01:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Run basic btrfs information commands in various ways, performing > sanity tests of: filesystem show, label, sync, and device stats > (sync is included just because it's simple). These are mostly > just smoke tests, although for exampl

Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-14 Thread Stefan Behrens
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:01:54 -0500, Rich Johnston wrote: > Thanks for reviewing this patch, may I put your Reviewed-by: on this > version? Yes. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Stefan Behrens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vge

Re: [PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-14 Thread Rich Johnston
Stefan, Thanks for reviewing this patch, may I put your Reviewed-by: on this version? Thanks --Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htm

[PATCH 3/3 V4] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

2013-03-13 Thread Eric Sandeen
Run basic btrfs information commands in various ways, performing sanity tests of: filesystem show, label, sync, and device stats (sync is included just because it's simple). These are mostly just smoke tests, although for example show by label & UUID should verify that the correct fs was shown. T